|
A.
To develop the initial cases we used the following format.
- To begin, the authors
are asked to write down a topic they would like to teach, and
one big “take home” message on this topic.
- Next, individuals
are asked to think of two or three realistic settings or scenarios
useful for leading students to explore that topic.
Avoid sci-fi scenarios, or having animals or plants talking.
It's very confusing and not usually appreciated by learners.
- Working in pairs,
each member explains their topic and possible scenarios, with
the intent of convincing the partner of the utility of at least
one of the scenarios.
- Next, each individual
drafts a brief paragraph or two describing the scenario/situation
as though writing to a nonscientist friend.
- In the last step,
new partnerships form, and each author reads his or her case aloud
with the partner responding by telling what he or she thinks the
case is about.
|
|
B.
We used the following case review process for further case development:
- Without
preamble or explanation of any kind, the case author reads
the case out loud to a small group of willing listeners whose
job is to tell the author what the case is about.
- The other members of the group offer suggestions (preferably
in the form of questions that the case stimulates for them) as
to what the case is about.
The author writes these down. The author does not
respond to the feedback from the listeners. 3.
After all the listeners have had their say, then the author
shares what he or she intended the case to be about. Sometimes there is great congruence
between what the listeners think and what the author intended,
often there is some incongruity.
- When there is much incongruity, it’s time to think about recasting
the case, perhaps in a new scenario.
Note: It's
best to delay the discussions of teaching strategies, assessment
strategies, and the like, until steps 1-3 are complete
|
|
C.
Structuring the Case for Learning
Once
the story clearly leads to the intended objectives, it is time to
start structuring the case for teaching.
- Go through the case
and decide which terms or phrases are the "hooks" -- those that
stimulate questions, learning, etc. Write down for each part
of the case the issues that are stimulated by that part of the
case. (See the short illustration of this process on the case
"Fleaing Louisiana.") This step
allows the author to decide if any paragraph has too much or
too little content.
-
Decide
where the story should be split up into parts for the students
to work on a bit at a time. Keep the parts short. They will contain much more
learning material than you anticipate. This is called "splitting up
the case" for teaching/learning. Of course, if you choose
to have a case with only one part this step will be unnecessary.
-
In
addition to the story (the narrative) the case might also
have as components:
-
A list of resources - you may wish to supply
a starting list of readings, web sites, etc.
You can make this longer or shorter, depending on your
goals for student learning.
If you want students to learn to find resources, the
list will be shorter, of course.
-
List of learning goals (these may or may not be given
to the students). It is helpful in some circumstances
to provide students with a list of the learning objectives
you had for the case.
It is important, however, to delay giving this to them
until after they have worked on the case for some time. Otherwise, the learning becomes
too teacher-directed and the power of student-centered learning
is lost.
-
Instructor’s guide - this is important if you
are teaching a course with multiple instructors or if you
are planning to publish the case.
The instructor’s guide lists the objectives and the
main anticipated learning issues.
It may also have information about resources, related
learning activities, possible student projects, suggested
products students could create related to this case, and the
like.
-
Visuals, simulations, web sites - these are
all possible components of cases that can be an integral part
of the case or resources to support learning with the case.
|
|
D.
What else goes with the case in your course?
You might want to think
about the larger picture of which the case is one part.
How will you assess student learning? What learning activities
might you link to the case to enhance learning? What products
or artifacts might students produce as a result of working on
this case?
See the case modules
produced by workshop participants
in the 2000 LifeLines OnLine, BioQUEST and HHMI workshops for
samples of the ways cases are linked to activities and assessed.
|
|