|
|
The BioQUEST Board of Advisors Maura Flannery, Chair (St. John’s University) Mario Caprio (Volunteer State Community College) The BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium is a community of bioscience
educators and researchers who are interested in undergraduate science
curricular The BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium offers a framework for thinking about curricular issues in science education based on a belief that students learn science most effectively when they are provided with opportunities to solve complex problems using the same methodologies and reasoning skills that research scientists use. In other words, students should have the opportunity to develop the long-term strategies of inquiry that sustain and guide practicing scientists. This philosophical framework has become known as the BioQUEST 3P’s of science education: that is, that science, and therefore science learning, involves Problem-posing, Problem-solving, and the Persuasion of peers. Problem-Posing. To understand science as it is practiced, students must have the opportunity to grapple with the difficulties involved in formulating good research questions. Students need to gain appreciation of how problem posing in the field or lab differs from solving already well-formulated exercises in a textbook. What makes a problem worth pursuing? Why are some questions “better” than others? How can students begin to understand the multiple issues involved in the posing of a problem, including interest, significance, feasibility, and the special problems that result when bias creeps into problem-posing? Problem-Solving. Science education must challenge students’ belief that every problem must have a “right” answer. When students become engaged in complex problems, they can experience and appreciate the nature of scientific answers and learn to develop heuristics for achieving closure to scientific problems. They learn to entertain multiple competing hypotheses and make inferences over a long series of experimental observations. By learning via research and research-like experiences, students come to understand that scientists develop hypotheses as provisional solutions rather than final answers. Research may be concluded for a variety of reasons, including constraints on time and resources, but most importantly when the research team is satisfied that their research provides an adequate solution to the problem being investigated. Persuading Peers. Research is not complete, no matter how many experiments have been conducted, until peers outside of the research team are persuaded that the solution to the particular problem is adequate—that is, has both internal logical consistency and consistency with appropriate, accepted knowledge in the discipline. Students must participate in the social processes of persuasion if they are to understand the nature of the construction of scientific theories. They need to participate in peer review as a professional activity. The use of computer tools and simulations can aid student groups in easily transferring their data, graphics, working hypotheses, and analyses into word-processing, spreadsheet, and graphics software to build scientific journal-style manuscripts which can be reviewed by student editorial boards and published in student-run journals or on the World Wide Web. Activities of The BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium The BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium is involved in a wide range of activities within the science education community. These include:
For information on how you can participate in the activities of the BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium or to receive BioQUEST Notes, please contact:
BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium |